So I really want to hear people experience about those. A lot of amazing inovation is happening in the space of refreshable multi line braille & tactile graphics displays.
We have the Monarch sitting in a premium place of its own.
https://www.aph.org/product/monarch/
But much more affordable (relatively), we have dotpad x, of which I have heard great description on Double Tap.
https://www.dotincorp.com/en/product/dotpadx
But, recently, I have discovered this new kid in the place, nobody else seem to mention it. Canute console Premium.
https://bristolbraille.org/about-canute-console-the-next-generation-in-braille/
For the latter, it doesn't pretend to be in the same tactile graphic display as the two others, rather that it can mimick it in a very useful way, if what I understand is correct. Plus, its pricing is very competitive, and it's open source!
I saw and Canadian Assistive Technology sells the Canute 360 at around $4500. Expensive, but why would I ever purchase a 40 cells braille display instead of a 9x40 cells one for more or less the same price?
I really can't understand why Monarch is so expensive while DotPad X, another real tactile graphic display, is at least 2 times less expensive, and has a real 20 cells row below the actual display (for those who know, this was the innitial description of the graphity plus before Humanware partners with APH instead).
For those who have any of these, I would love to know what is your experience with it from a screen reader support point of view. Does VoiceOver actually shows more than one line as its doc pretends it can?
I saw that video of the canute 360 on youtube and the insane sound it makes, but I think that was a prototype device. And Monarch is just slightly quiter than that. I know somebody who works for Humanware and has Monarch for home because of that, and will try this as soon as I can.
I hope this thread can become something important for that emerging space, or at least start a conversation.
PS: if this actually works, how useful can Freeform on mac become with any of these devices?
PS2: something some people may mix: a tactile graphic/multi line braille display, is not aimed, nor can, replicate pixel by pixel an actual monitor. You really have to understand this subtle point. I was making this confusion before so...
Comments
The DotPadX
THis is one intriguing device I wish to get one day. I listened to a podcast recently where the device seems to achieve a lot for what it is sold for.
Their website is terrible though
I respect Dotincorp a lot for what they do, but they could care more about their website about specialist products for blind / low vision. It's infinitely worse on mobile.
A serious question for you
I have a class where we're doing flowcharts and other network diagram, the regular folks with visio, me with UML (plantuml to be exact). In a couple of semesters I'll be doing user interface design web/mobile. So far the other blind student has done all these without any special accessory, the teacher does phisical mockups.
I wonder, if my grant permits, which should I buy, between a PIAF machine from Humanware (the UK equivalent might be fuse touch something) with enough swell papers, a tactile graphic embosser, or dotpad x / canute console premium? or, I really don't want, or Monarch?
I know that in a way or another in my career I'll need some effective way to have real visual/spacial perception.
Those who are in these things, are you able to compare?
I would also be doing relatively advanced math, calculus 3+, where something like dotpad x or monarch seem to suit more.
Note that I already have a braille doodle and this device should be on everyone's hand here especially given its price and what it allows in spite of being less expensive than an apple watch SE.
For pure maths, I would have thought about tactipad, but I'd rather need to either print computerized graphs or realtime refreshes.
Maybe try Desmos
Desmos have an accessible graphing calculator that conveys the generated graphs as sound. It doesn't work well for me since I have quite a hard time distinguishing between parabolic and hyperbolic shapes, or triangle from sine waves, to name a few examples, but your mileage may vary so maybe give it a try if you haven't already. You can use an expression like
y=sin(x)*xto produce a wavy graph whose waves increase in size as you get father away from the origin in order to gage how it sounds like.