Voice Dream Reader for iOS is now $59.99/year

By Labsii, 24 April, 2023

Forum
iOS and iPadOS

With the latest update Voice Dream Reader for IOS can be downloaded for free from the App Store.

Also on the App Store there is a subscription listed that costs 59.99$/year.

It seems that this roll out is buggy so it is not clear how it will work regarding the subscription.

Technically the new free app cannot check if someone bought it when it was paid. However it is possible that the developer did update the app in some previous version to register that the user was the user of the paid app, which seems to be the case as it hasn't asked anything when I just started the app. However that isn't bullet proof as if someone hasn't updated the app recently he may lose the record that he was a buyer. Also if someone doesn't have iCloud turned on this record may not transfer to his next device (and it seems that just reinstalling the app will break this record, read more below).

For the purpose of testing, I did uninstall the app. It seems that the app forgot that I was the paid user and I've got the screens asking me to create account and also one mentioning subscription. I have just skipped those screens and the app still works, but I guess that it might be the bug or that I am just temporarily allowed to use the app without subscription.

Just to note that I am a developer of another app (Speech Central) which is completely free when used with VoiceOver. As such I could risk my license for the purpose of experiment. I don't suggest anyone else to do so.

Take care!

Options

Comments

By Andy Lane on Tuesday, April 2, 2024 - 18:12

I’ll have to do it in 2 weeks just so the payments are on the right date but I’m very very impressed. I think this is Jonathan getting as close to angry as his sober balanced and methodical approach allows and the community is all the better for it. Thank you Jonathan for taking a stand against something thats wrong. I respect your willingness to use your platform to address this issue publicly. You’ve walked the perfect line right from the start. I know there are risks as well as rewards for doing this so once more. Thank you.

By Igna Triay on Tuesday, April 2, 2024 - 18:12

I had already reported the app via the, report a problem, in the appstore, but given this goes directly to the app review team, I reported it via this channel described by jonathan as well, including links to their blog post where applause group announced the new terms and that all will be forced ;to go subscription, including long time customers who bought and owned the app as a one time purchase. This will sound harsh, but I really hope these guys, applause group, get the boot from apple's side. What they're doing is beyond scummy.

By Yaniv on Tuesday, April 2, 2024 - 18:12

Thanks to the strength of the community and the work of Mr. Mosen. I have now some confident that the new owners can come with a new plan that will provide sustainability to Applause Group and entice new and existing users to give it money for new features on a subscription or even on a per-feature basis, without blocking core functionality in the app.

By Andy Lane on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Hi everyone, Column 1

Following our recent announcement to transition Voice Dream to a subscription, we received an overwhelming response from thousands in our community. Your feedback, along with the impactful stories shared about Voice Dream being a pivotal part of your daily lives, has led us to reverse this change. Column 1

We will continue to provide access to the app's existing features at no additional cost. As we continue developing Voice Dream, some new features may be offered as part of a subscription, but the current capabilities will remain free to those who have already purchased Voice Dream. Column 1

For those who have already moved to a subscription, it's no longer necessary to continue using the app. You may cancel your subscription, but we welcome you to keep it active to support ongoing development. Column 1

To those who wish to support Voice Dream, please consider a subscription, a one-time donation via our website, or simply leaving a positive review in the App Store.

We sincerely thank you for your passionate and loyal support of Voice Dream. Your voices have made a difference. Row 2 Column 1

I don’t know whether it was out of fear from being reported to Apple or because they realised they genuinely made a mistake. I lost an enormous amount of trust in this company over the last week and its going to take a lot to regain that from me and I’m guessing others but lets just assume it was realising they’d made a mistake. I’d rather think good of people than not.

To the Voicedream team at Applause. Thank you for reversing this decision. I know a couple of people who will be delighted.

Assuming everything goes smoothly over the next few months, I’ll be donating for definite and can’t wait to see what features you develop that are chargeable. Thats completely fair and they should be paid for features.

Thanks once more.

By Datawolf on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

In light of the most recend controversy around VDR, I sat down and did a little DNS checkup of the app, this means I activated an intercepting proxy for my phone and looked at the data coming through. I looked at the data that VDR sends out when starting the app in normal use.
I can't tell what exactly the data packages include because I haven't cracked them open yet, under iOS this is abit harder than under android and they might be encrypted as well, but the domains that I found were giving some interesting things.
Firstly there is superwall.me which is apparently a tool to integrate paywalls into your product, so this apparently has been there for a long time, I don't know though why they wouldn't use apples infrastructure for this.
Quote from their website: Stop wrestling with your codebase to build paywalls. Start building & deploying paywalls in 10 minutes flat.

Secondly it connects to a bunch of google services like crashlytics, google tag manager, and a firebase remote config server.
For those not in the loop, firebase is a sweet of app creation tools by google.
It then connects to facebook and in the name of god, I don't even know why it does so. I have no facebook account linked, no connection between facebook and VDR and I don't know why it opens a connection to Meta in general.
Next one is onesignal.com which is an external push messaging provider. Again I am wondering why they don't use APNS, the push notification service from apple themselves.
Lastly, it connects to three different app analytics and data collections websites, namely app measurement, amplitude.com and sentry.io.
I wonder how seriously the team behind VDR take our privacy if 2 of the biggest data collectors, google and Meta are included in the app and there is no way to opt out of that.
This also wasn't asked when you install the app for the first time which is a blatant violation of the GDPR.
So yeah, make of this what you will.

By Superfreq on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

I don't know why the heck they didn't simply allow people to continue using the app in it's current state if they wanted to (as the app store guidelines require), then offer an optional half price or lower tier for those who wanted just bugfixes and updates to keep up with new IOS releases,, with the additional 5 dollar per month tier being just for those who wanted the new features. Split it into two apps if that's easier. They would probably claim that this would have been too complicated, but you can easily add a plain English description to in app purchases that really covers everything well if you take your time to do it right, and craft media releases that explain things further while being there to answer people's questions. Also, the annual only subscription option is just out of touch in 2024. One of the few advantages of subscription to the end user is that you can spread the cost out so that it has a much lower up front impact. That's precisely why most monthly subscriptions offer a discounted yearly one as well, to entice people into a purchase that is higher risk to the customer and higher reward for the company; something that they likely wouldn't want to do without an incentive.
Additionally, I still maintain that 5 dollars per month is too much when this app is more mainstream than other blindness apps and the burden therefore can be shared between a greater number of users. They also supposedly have other apps in their portfolio, so Voicedream really shouldn't have to carry their company so much unless something is seriously wrong at applause group HQ. but I don't know their true finances in the end...
For a company who say this is their whole thing, they really suck at it. Just a complete cluster all around. Removing features and forcing people into a subscription is totally against the app store guidelines which is probably much more to do with why they backed off rather than the community pressure, because people started reporting the app. Communication sucked, and they kept asking us to direct how this would go via email feedback, despite the fact that half of the things we had a problem with were complete business 101 no brainers that they really shouldn't need to rely on the customer for in the first place. Maybe they are nice people who just don't know what the heck they're doing, but they completely through away their trust with all but the most naive users, and it's a shame, if indeed they were planning on useful new features. I hope that they don't eventually abandon the app entirely now and allow it to fall behind new IOS releases to the point that it gets removed from the app store.

By charles on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Did you notice that, during Jonathan's interview, the statement was given that those who already purchased the app would get a 25% discount? Then, however, Jonathan asked what would happen if the subscription price goes up in the future? Would the customers who originally paid for the app still pay the same? The answer was, finally, due to being pressed for clarification, was that we would be charged a 25% discount of the new, higher price. So, if the subscription goes up to $100, users who originally bought the app would now be charged $75, not $60. Fortunately, now that I don't have to subscribe, I will not. Due to their untrustworthy treatment in the past, they're going to have to earn my trust through vastly improved and honest communication with customers.

By 3AM on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Hi all,

Here is my take and ultimate conclusion to the unfortunate turn of events regarding this topic.

As I've followed VDR's (Voice Dream Reader) switch to paid model story unfold, I've been taken by surprise that VDR pursued a strong stand towards a subscription model including for all existing users. This alone was a breach of trust and a loss of confidence for many of us.

upon a broad public discovery of their percieved greedy business intent, did they indeed have an epiphany, and realise how many people with limited or fixed income use and depend heavily on their newly acquired product? Do they now truly understand how damaging their decision was? Hmmm... That may be so. BUT, I have only to "assume" these are savvy business individuals who saw and took an opportunity to sharply grow their revenue.

In my mind, I cannot see how one can arbitrarily demand long-time existing users to begin now paying to continue using a product they've already purchased, especially with no added benefit proportionate to its price hike!

It's clear to me and many other users across the world who have depended on and stood by VDR, promoting it every chance we got, we can no longer trust the new owners of this app.

Dear Winston, I'm sure I speak for thousands when I say, we valued your dedication and commitment on behalf of those of us who used your app regularly, for so much of our daily tasks.

In addition, the new revelation of this app's extensive and undisclosed communication with so many unrelated and extremely unnecessary third party entities is a critical and damaging fact I personally cannot overlook at any cost.

It greatly concerns me personally. And it should you as well!

VDR's reversal to not charge existing users does not persuade me that they sincerely have the end-user at heart. Because of public backlash, they were simply forced to do so. And that sentiment is unsettling.

To me, VDR is no longer an app I can safely trust. I don't trust their privacy efforts. I don't trust their ultimate aims. I don't trust they won't force another subscription attempt in a year, 2 or who knows when, or worst....

I have made my mind up. I will be migrating everything out of VDR. This is an unfortunate reality since I've personally invested and leaned heavily on VDR for so many years for so many reasons and purposes.

For me, switching out of VDR right now is the wise thing to do, rather than continue kicking the ball down the road to eventually jump quickly off. No. I'll migrate out for sure before its too late and I find myself regretting waiting!

Labsii at SC (Speech Central), I appreciate what you are doing! Please don't sell SC! And if you do, because the decision makes sense for you, on behalf of the B&VIP (blind & visually impaired people) community; if at all possible, PLEASE ensure your ethically preferred business model is written in the contract!

There are a couple hiccups with SC I would love to see addressed. Please provide the best forum to share those with you.

Friends, these are my own views in coming to a determination as to what steps to take next.

As hard as it is, developers ought to consider thrice how they implement serious changes that affect so many of their users. After all, users are your greatest asset! VDR forgot that, and perhaps felt that user's great need for the app would supercede VDR's newfound hunger for wealth.

In closing, SC's ability to use Microsoft Azure voices is phenomenal! It's not too difficult to setup. I've used it for 2 months now and have yet to pay a single dime. Try it. They blows VDR's voices out of the water!

No! I don't work for SC nor have investments in anyway. However, I do value this product, especially now since I've spent much more time gdigging into it for myself. It is worth your time and effort to get familiar with it. Awesome is the fact that it easily syncs with iCloud and has a decent Mac app as well. There are a lot of plus points for SC.

I genuinely believe, in time, SC can surpass the competition as far is features, compatibility, functionality, quality, and of course price! Much of this will depend on our willingness to contribute our experiences with the developer.

This is ultimately what separates one from another. So, here's to Speech Central's progress!

Here's to an experiment tried and failed! So long VDR... Hello SC!

Thank you for reading MHO (my honest opinion)...

By Dennis Long on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

This is do to the developers poor attitude towards members. This developer attacks users. This has happened more then once. This developer thinks it is a "waste of time to give tech support" so Yes VDR screwed up and should have to earn our trust they deserve a second chance to prove themselves. it is worth noting I would've gladly did the $10 donation had the dev of speech central not attacked me and helped me resolve my issue.

By Labsii on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Dennis has asked first on whether it is possible for the app to implement the system tts.

We had several rounds of similar questions/answers as this question isn't phrased properly.

When he finally asked on how to use Eloquence voices in the app, he had received the proper answer - that they are by default filtered out by the 'Exclude robots' option from the menu.

While this conversation took longer than it should at the time when I was flooded with questions, I still considered that as fine.

But at the point when he wanted to use the public forums to say that I haven't provided him with the support though he got 10x more of support than any other user in that period I did say that my support ends there, especially as the case seemed resolved.

After analysing the case, I did find four points:
1. it is possible that he may have activated other filters that are not active by default. More precise information would be that the user should ensure that all filters are in the off state in the menu. However it is highly advised that if the user doesn't know what some setting do he should return it to the default setting, exactly because the customized experience without direct access to the device to understand it makes the support very hard unless the user is aware of it.
2. I have decided that Exclude robots should be off for VoiceOver users to improve general experience as many are likely to search for the Eloquence voices
3. I have made the official policy regarding the support and made it public
4. I do consider to have some very premium tier that would allow users to ask for this kind of support and possibly some other benefits

To conclude, out of hundreds of thousands of users less than 5 users got this answer in their support sessions (likely 2 or 3 but I don't have exact statistics). Out of dozen thousand of blind users just one user got this answer. Still I haven't ignored it and I took it as a chance to make several improvements.

In Speech Central every support case is considered as the improper design of the app and actions are being taken to fix that for the future.

By Dennis Long on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

I'm glad you took the opertunity to improve things. in the future you might not want to say it is a waste of time to help new users. Not every user will know how to use your app. I do also suggest adding audio formats and bookshare titles if they aren't already added.

By Tayo on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

I enjoy using Speech Central, although mostly on my Mac. I would suggest, however, that some of the less obvious features be given some kind of tutorial, the Azure voices for example. I took a look at it, but can't honestly say I know how to set up the feature; consequently I left it alone. I'll take another look at it and see if I can figure it out, but I'm probably not the only user who would appreciate knowledge of how to use such a feature.

I, perhaps foolishly, have decided to hold on to my copy of VoiceDream, mostly because I purchased any number of voices I'm quite happy with that suit my specific use case and that iOS voices have thus far failed to help with. But the breach of trust is very, very real. No one can say with confidence that this will never happen again. I would encourage the developer of Speech Central to keep up the good work, and to try and have patience with those individuals who grow frustrated over features they have trouble understanding. This is where a tutorial of some sort would help.

By Labsii on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Thanks Dennis, I also wanted to apologise as the discussion after that went too far and I do take my responsibility for that.

I do consider the audio formats as a legitimate request. Among other policies I have made a Development request policy which explains how those issues are treated: https://speechcentral.net/development-request-policy/

Also I do agree on the documentation and it may be further improved, though that is also a development request. But it is and will be improved over the time, this is somewhat easier to answer.

Regarding the Azure, I am not sure if Tayo has went through the help, specifically through this section: https://speechcentral.net/ios-help/#azure

It should be a reasonable effort if it is followed step by step.

Other than that i do agree that in the perfect world the help info should be in the service setup dialog and not that hard to find, but in Apple's world that would be considered as a sales of digital service and Apple would need the 15% cut (which would then result that I need to have a mid server between the consumer and the real service). Just like this I obviously don't sell this service and people don't get in touch with Microsoft inside the app, so sales happens on the internet and is only activated in the app, which is allowed. And even bigger paradox is that most people get the free tier anyway, but the fact that some people may buy Apple would consider as a potential sales from my side.

So I did have to minimize the prominence of this documentation to the level that should be allowed for this purpose.

By Dennis Long on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

offering support to members will go a long way and just in general not attacking potential users will go a long way. your apology is accepted. I want to see your app have success and there be a good alternative to voicedream and other services for those that can't afford the subscription or just don't choose to subscribe to it. When you add audio formats support everything mp3, m4b, m4a, ogg ETC.

By Igna Triay on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

While I'm glad applause was forced to back down, despite that I stopped using voice dream since a little before it was sold to applause group... The sites it connects to, specifically google and facebook... This is a book reader app; it should, in my opinion, have no business connecting to these sites, for one; and for another, you aren't told that this is the case, so breach of privacy and trust, right there, just from the get goâ‹… I mean everyone knows google and facebook don't really care about your privacy, they cell your data to the highest bitter... So then why in the world is a book reading app contacting these services? It makes no sense. Unless, of course, they're celling your data or something of that nature, but this app should have no business connecting to these services, in my opinion. I'm glad for the vdr users that the decision got reversed, although, as some have well pointed out; it was do to backlash. If there hadn't been any backlash, chances are they would have kept the decision; and it is precisely these sorts of things th,at say a lot about a company, and to me, what they're saying out loud is... We're not to be trusted, as a decision like the one made should've never been made in the first place, and it only got reversed do to them getting backed into a corner, and us forcing their hand via reporting to apple. I just... All of this, to me doesn't inspire confidence, to be honest, but who knows? Maybe time will prove me wrong? But as it stands, their current image is... not looking good at all, as they did it once; they're likely to do it again per all that happened. I.e: their reversing of their decision do to publick backlash and not do to the, oh we messed up factor, plus others... I'm sorry but if there was a chance of me going back to vdr some day... With all that's happened? Its well and truly gone. I won't put my trust in a company that can flip at a dime like this unless things drastically change, and their is undeniable proof that they've actually changed for the better. but this is just my opinion.

By Moopie Curran on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Hi,
I HATE annual subscriptions, I like monthly better, so I see there are different tiers for voice dream, a $4.99 a month, a $5.99 a month, a $9.99 a month, and a $19.99 a month tier. What's the difference between these? I know we'll have the features we already payed for, but I need it on my mac too, which still requires a subscription. So what subscription should I pick if I still want it on my mac and iOS devices? The voice dream on mac was never a one-time purchase. I definitely want monthly though, as $59 is quite a chunk to be taken at once. I can always upgrade the subscription if I find it necessary, but I do know for sure, I definitely need voice dream on my mac and iOS devices, as I read on all of them. But I'm very confused about the tiered subscriptions. Any help would be appreciated.

By Medved Mitarev on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

I do have the same question too. I really wanted to use voice dream on my mac as well. I love reading in the computer and don't really like to use 2 separate book readers on my one company devices. Also, I was about to get the speech central copy, but i'm not really liking the program and am just using it so I don't use voice dream due to all the sytes it sends info to. Actually it's not that I don't really like it, it's that I don't really get used to it. There's not a manual on what slider does what thing, I tend to miss my 15/30 seconds sliders, you can only read with voices that you already have installed on your OS and no more so yeah.
Thank you.

By Dave Nason on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Member of the AppleVis Editorial Team

If people wish to ask or answer about how the new subscription model works, it is fine to do so here too.
Thanks.

By Amir on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

After this tortuous road, I'm not in a position to trust the new Voice Dream Reader developers any longer, and Speech Central offers everything I want. It's well-maintained, and the developer does a great job of answering questions and addressing user comments, even a lot faster and more than what we get from paid apps.

By Sebby on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

The revelations of and focus on the "analytics" in Voice Dream is both necessary and refreshing. Thank you. Even in spite of the payment model reversal, this is concerning.

What is the situation with Speech Central? Last I looked they were publicly disclosed but non-optional. To be clear, all analytics are inherently bad and should be optional, because they always disclose at least your public IP address and an identifier. I would therefore strongly prefer an app where they could be disabled. At the moment VDR still has the functional high ground, but I hope SC can change that.

By Labsii on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

All apps must disclose their data collection in the App Store, and user may on top of that use iPhone features to track what domains the app contacts.

I have removed any data collection in Speech Central since the latest big overhaul of the app, so the app is declared as such, previously it did collect only anonymous data. It had never tracked users across apps and shared data with suspicious third parties like for example Facebook.

In general anonymous tracking isn't something that one should be afraid, but after 10 years of that I think that I am confident that I know what people want from apps like this and I could disable that.

I fully understand the users that after many years of memory muscle of VDR feel at home only there. It is certainly necessary for them to invest some time to get used to SC and it is their own decision whether they want that or not.

However while everyone's free to share his own impressions, sharing of fresh impressions may also end up in spread of false facts. For example one user claimed here how SC has only built-in voices while VD has more of a choice. If we had to measure the opposite would be more correct - SC has much more advanced AI voices from Microsoft Azure and there are more of them. Certainly you can go into fine details that they are not completely unlimited when used for free or that they require online connection. But still the claim that VDR is notable ahead in this area is hard to sustain.

By Sebby on Tuesday, April 9, 2024 - 18:12

Thanks for that @ Labsii.

I would have no objection to analytics that are carefully considered as long as they're completely optional. People like me can reach you on AppleVis.

I am going to try to switch to SC full time. To be clear I have no issue with the "nuts n' bolts" approach at all. It is not the core functionality that is the problem, it's all the rest. Now of course you can use BookPlayer for m4b files, or ListenLater for OpenAI voices. VDR was never perfect of course, but it did combine a lot of useful tools (and some completely unnecessary ones, like a pronunciation dictionary) in the app. I'm glad that you can appreciate that there is a lot wrapped up in that app, not just muscle memory but a lot of positive past sentiment. No doubt unpicking that, beyond the core functionality, is legitimately difficult for some.

Again thanks for being engaged. It's appreciated.

By Medved Mitarev on Tuesday, April 16, 2024 - 18:12

heya all.
OK, I've finally gave up on voice dream and have purchased the mac version of speech central. However, it would be neet if the dev adds a hotkey to know in what part of the book you are. In the iphone the regulator expresses it and you can really know where you are, but over here with the regulator and the remaining pages to finish the chapter it's not too much info. it'll be highly appreciated. Thanks.

By Labsii on Thursday, April 25, 2024 - 18:12

Similar to the iPad the play button doesn't display the progress as there is the slider on the screen for that purpose. In general it should be visible unless the size of window is extremely small.

One of the options is to turn on the bottom bar to which the slider and some controls are moved. That should make it visible even on smaller windows.

By Labsii on Thursday, April 25, 2024 - 18:12

There is one interesting thing happening under the radar.

In the latest update VD has added new improved "edit" feature, whatever it means (if someone has a subscription some information would be nice to hear as without looking it this sounds like some marketing and not real feature).

But the old "edit" feature is gone and now if you want to edit you will need to buy the subscription.

Time will tell, but this sounds like a very good legal strategy to workaround the terms of service in a year or two by dropping the features one by one and replacing them with new features even if they might not have much of new inside.

By Andy Lane on Thursday, April 25, 2024 - 18:12

That they learned their lesson and wouldn’t try any sly ways to artificially make the subscription a requirement by removing features people paid for. It doesn’t matter how it happens, if people lose features they bought, it’s still theft and I very very much doubt Applause will be given another chance by the community. They are playing with fire and the flames only just died down. If they want to test the resolve of the community, I’d invite that test. I don’t think it would go well for them. They can add new features all they want and consumers will make their decisions but any more funny business and their investment will be worthless. We’ll lose an app and thats sad but at some point we have to draw a line and say these people aren’t playing by the rules and we reject them for it. I see many comments of people they’ve already lost from their previous shenanigans. Any similar japes won’t be welcomed or tolerated is my prediction.

By Andy Lane on Thursday, May 2, 2024 - 18:12

Yeh I know exactly what you mean. I’ve had the app for over a decade and never found much of a use for it. I do know people get a lot from the app though. It’s the way some people enjoy books and those people don’t have much else to look forward to which is why I’m so outspoken about this app.

By Andy Lane on Thursday, May 2, 2024 - 18:12

That it makes all media whether books, pdf’s, documents or audiobooks use a similar UI. I think people get used to a UI and like that they always know how to do things instead of using a different app for each format they’re trying to read. As I say, it doesn’t offer me much. I’ve bought voices in VDR but now we have Siri voices in iOS, all the VDR voices seem inferior to me. As I say, I think its the fact that the UI is predictable, its a single place for all formats and its a single place to store everything. It definitely has benefits for some but not me. Or not that I’ve found yet. It can’t be about the voices so those are my assumptions.

By Karok on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

i like it; all we need now is that ability to use those voices with kindle; one of the UK voices sounds creepy then back to how it should be. fantastic though how it reads.

By Chris Hill on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

Seems like a lot of people aren't getting why one would wish to use either program over something like Kindle or iBooks. First of all, you can lock the phone and put it away and keep reading. Second, you can stop and start, back up and go forward all with controls on your listening device. I seldom read with my behind in a chair and the phone in front of me, and I always want a way to back up, interruptions are a fact of life. I think Kindle, Ibooks, and even bookshare's own reader have to be some of the worst apps for reading ever invented.

By Karok on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

You can't lock the phone and read, and have pages turn with voicedream and kindle.

By Ryder on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

Yaniv, thanks for the link to Elevenlabs AI reader. The voices are very high quality. So far my favorite is Matilda. She sounds very natural, better than anything in Voice Dream in my opinion. I checked all the voices and like a couple others too and will keep experimenting with them.

By Yaniv on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

Not just the actual sound but also the expressiveness achieved by the use of AI. My main concern with the app is that it won’t remain free and not before long some sort of sub plan will be introduced to all users.

By Tayo on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

I particularly like the expressiveness; makes reading books more like reading audiobooks than textbooks. If this were to go sub, I would probably subscribe, so long as they're transparent about the reasons why.

By Karok on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

if these voices can be used i still wouldn't want to have to keep my phone unlocked, just to read in audio for me, but as others have said, page-turning when locked just isn't possible.

By Tayo on Thursday, May 16, 2024 - 18:12

If you mean with this particular app, I haven't tried it yet. But VoiceDream can do continuous reading, Speech Central reads one chapter at a time, and this app has a pause button you can access from the lock screen. Only Kindle and iBooks seem to have fallen behind on this front. Once upon a time, you could ask Siri to read an entire iBook just by saying speak screen, then locking your phone. No longer possible.