Opinion, Apple Silicon may not be the game changer we all wanted

By Dominic, 24 April, 2023

Forum
Apple Hardware and Compatible Accessories

Note.
I don’t know where to put the since this relates to both the ice pad and the MacBook/Mac desktop, so I have put it in other apple chat section.
What is Apple Silicon?
Apple Silicon, is a process of made by Apple Inc, a technology company that was made originally in the mid 1970s. The CEO was, none other than the legends of Steve Jobs. However, unfortunately in 2011, he unfortunately passed away.
Tim Cook, then took the reins of, Apple Inc, and made it better, for some people at least.
However, not everyone got a reprieve from the jobs to the Kwãkù era.
Some people reported more accessibility issues than ever before. With iOS, and macOS, it’s slowly slowly came down a dark, dark hill, until at the end of it,, it was a dark abyss.
But we have to be thankful.
Steve Jobs made so many good inventions.
The Apple Pencil, the iPhone 6, he was a part in the iPhone 5 creation, he made the iPhone X, revolutionise the iPhone 7 and updated the iPhone 8, gave the people who wanted their old square corners back in the iPhone 12, get is the iPhone SE three shots at redemption to be a small phone of liking, made new MacBooks, but the most monumental achievement in Apple‘s eyes was making own Mac silicon processor ,
Back WWDC 2020, Apple allow themselves to say that there would be a new processor coming out
And you chip, based on completely new hardware, a completely new evolution to the point, where in some eyes, it would be a game changer for all, but not a game changer for some.
Apples on arm processor.
if you do not know what Ahmadzai is, arm is a special type of hardwood chip inside the processor that graphical losses in the mall, limit take that part of the operating system, which resulted in
Longer battery life
Sort of more close operating system
And extremely fast performance?
in November 2020 20, Apple introduce the first Apple processor for the Mac its self, no longer relying on Intel. This was called the transition from until to Apple M1, sort of Halle, the transition from PowerPC processes to Intel, and then into Apple Silicon. But people were wondering.
What would this mean?
This, basically, would Evolution Of the entire Apple community, Alana new hardware, call Lemonade, called Rosetta two. Zero.
It was basically like Rosetta 1.0, which is the framework that developers use to transfer the applications over from an old processor to a new processor, Say if we transferred from a Microsoft excuse to processor Joe PowerPC processor
You would need Rosella to put an old coding for the transfer, etc, etc, and checked the app works on the arm processor/paprika PC processor,
So, to allow developers to get ready to put the apps over to use, Apple Silicon, and WWDC, 2020, Apple made something called to develop a transition kit
Just have to design of an iPad mini and a Mac mini, With an Apple A12Z Bionic processor as far as I know.
What does basically did was it was Hamza that developers so that they could make the applications accessible with not only Rosetta, 2.0, but Apple Silicon its self.
Apple Silicon was released on MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air, along with an iMac desktop.
More iterations of Apple Silicon, well later released.
The latest one is in the latest 14 and 16 inch MacBook pros released in early January of this year, 2023.
They house I’ve a MacBook Pro 14 inch or 16 inch reviver, an M2 pro on M2, Max processor? But, as Apple Silicon, really the right way to go?
Here are the reason why Apple Silicon is good?
Increases battery life increases performance, closest to operating system a little bit more, add more up compatibility, and allows a finalist design.
But, has anybody fall off the negatives of Apple Silicon?
Here are the reason why Apple Silicon is good?
Increases battery life increases performance, closest to operating system a little bit more, add more up compatibility, and allows a finalist design.
But, has anybody thought of the negatives of Apple Silicon?
Not everybody is going to switch from Rosetter to Rosana to, let alone use the Apple Silicon architecture.
Not everybody is going to use that, so you’re basically dead if you have an apple Silicon Mac device but try to get an application that doesn’t have the Apple Silicon.
Comment, your thoughts below, because I think this might be an interesting topic.

Options

Comments

By Manuel on Saturday, April 22, 2023 - 02:11

For me, personally, Apple Silicon brought me to the Mac. In 2021, I bought a MacBook Air M1 and I'm still impressed by the great battery life, the performance and the fact that we can now use iPad and iPhone apps on the Mac as well which has become very useful for me. The thing you've mentioned about Rosetta and some apps that are not Apple Silicon-ready has never been a show stopper for me. In fact, I actually don't know an application where Rosetta does not work properly. Most apps I use throughout the day are compatible with the M Chips.
The only thing that bothers me is that VoiceOver seems not to use the perfocmance increase of the M Chips. I hope VoiceOver will get more performance boosts in the future as well as bug fixes.

By Holger Fiallo on Saturday, April 22, 2023 - 02:11

The hardware is great but the iPad has the wrong oS. Do not think the iOS that is for the phone is right for the iPad. Perhaps Apple need to review it. Probably would be better if the iPads get the Mac software. Since I do not use a Mac I do not if would it be best or not.

By Laurent on Saturday, April 22, 2023 - 02:11

In my opinion, the real revolution is at the software level... Tim Cook's hardware orientation probably explains the problems in Apple's operating systems as well as at the voice assistant level. Imagine what could be an iPhone with which we could talk as we do with chat GPT. and paradoxically, LLMs are not so recent! I am sure that if Steve Jobs was still alive, iPhones would have been able to integrate such systems to replace our good old and very stupid Siri. The iPhone could thus become a machine with which we can talk and to which we could explain what we want. I think it's time to replace Tim Cook with a real visionary CEO. Sorry, I know that I’m off topic.

By Dominic on Saturday, April 22, 2023 - 02:11

Tim Cook, make the iPad better, but Steve Jobs made it first.
Tim Cook moved to Apple Silicon, but Steve Jobs make the Mac Intel.
Tim Cook make the iPhone X, but Steve Jobs made the iPhone.
What would Steve Jobs be thinking in the grave, how his company has gone from hero to 01Kwãkù was there
Maybe his in the grave, making with the Apple users to get iOS 17, when it comes out in September?
Tim Cook allowed eloquence, but Steve Jobs made VoiceOver.
Tim Cook make the Mac studio, but Steve Jobs make the Mac Pro.
Steve Jobs made touch ID, but Steve Jobs made a personal computer.
You see, Steve Jobs has made way more things and Apple Dan, Tim, Cook ever could, When Apple was close to death, jobs came back and bring it out of the fire, and now we’re just going.

By Sebby on Saturday, April 22, 2023 - 02:11

Small, quiet, cool, UNIX. With a Linux VM, for the things Linux can't really be beaten on. It is now the desktop server that my old Windows 2000 trolley computer was, back then. I decided to give Asahi Linux a miss--too long to wait--and just do it the Mac way, and though not perfect, definitely better than any other option out there.

I also note that Apple Silicon does increase responsiveness, even in apps like Chrome. It doesn't remove the bugs, though.