Do you think game developers should mention the game is only for the blind and visually impaired?

In my own opinion, why do we need to be so damn different? For one thing, just because an app is accessible, why do we have to say it's for visually impaired? Accessing an app, or a game should just be obvious. Remember what works for me, may not for you. what i wouldn't touch about an app's inner workings, you might wish or ask, for it to be rebuilt from the ground up. As for mainstream games, I just play them if I want too. If I need help, I ask or if I can memorize how to get where i need to, i do that. If you look at it, we are already different in ways we can't control. We walk with a cane or guide dog, we hold phones upside down to hear their speech. We fold money differently. I personally try to do things as easy as the rest of the world. I am not at all interesting in segragating things any more than they are already.

I hate developers saying a game is spasifically for the blind it just makes us different in that way. I don't think they should mention that at all.

While I appreciate the game being accessible, I hate this as well. I don’t think you need to point out differences. It’s not promoting inclusivity. It is something that segregates.

I would agree with Charles, although I would amend that statement to say we cannot play many games without eyesight.

I think mentioning anything along the lines of "designed with the blind in mind", os a hinderance to everyone. You can make it clear in your description that the game is accessible, and even audio only, but don't put it in the slogan, and for heaven's sake, never, ever put it in the title (unless it enriches that title). A Blind Legend makes sense in terms of narrative for instance. But there are lots of titles which do not. Heck, even the ill-fated GOld Gun - starring, of all things a blind protagonist, didn't do that. Sure, sighted people might not want to play your audio game, but why make it easier for them to make that call? Hook with the description. Make it sound interesting, and then outline accessibility. it's like when a creator shows something off with the description like: "This isn't really very good, but please pay attention to it anyway."

well: first thing, i hate that. We, yeah are blind people, but are we from another planet? thing, whitch you are saying is like hey dude this game is only for blinds, blindy is different from us, they are from another area, another planets. I really hate that situation

No! NO! NO! They shouldn't make us sound so different, and it is also extremely rude to discriminate against the sighted people who want to play audio games. It'd be just as stupid as saying a game is only for girls. Of course I also object to the common practice of labeling games, toys, and websites with age limits that only go up to 99 because I don't think any of those amazing people who have made it to 100 or beyond should be made to feel like they should just give up on life and die now. It is just important to mention what kind of game it is so people can make an informed decision about whether it is likely to be fun for them. Mentioning what accessibility features and compatibility it has is part of that necessary description.

I don't think developers should mention that it is for blind only. Myself, I would be offended if an app says for sighted only.
I think that if an app is accessible to both blind and sighted it should be mentioned, but I don't think developers should say it's for blind or sighted only.

In the title and it should say that it is for everyone.